October 5th, 2008

Our Tax System

If you’re new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Or, join our email list and get a free audio gift. Thanks for visiting!

Someone else forwarded this to me and I had to add it to the post.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers,’ he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.’Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.  But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’ They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

‘I only got a dollar out of the $20,’declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,’ but he got $10!’  ‘Yeah, that’s right,’ exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a dollar, too.
It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!’  ‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!’

‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!’

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.  The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
University of Georgia

For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Tag Your FavoritesThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
November 4th, 2007

The Protectionist Sentiment

At a recent Society for International Business Fellows (SIBF) luncheon, a speaker with an impressive background in both the domestic and international financial sectors shared some speculative and provocative insights on the quaintness of the protectionist sentiment and the idea of economic nationalism.

To give you some background, Atlanta is the sixth Federal Reserve district covering Georgia, Alabama, parts of Mississippi and Tennessee, Florida, and the southern half of Louisiana. This region populates 45 million people and has an estimated economy of $2 trillion, which is roughly 13% of the U.S. economy. If this district were a country, its economy would be between those of Italy and Canada or roughly the eighth largest in the world.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tag Your FavoritesThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
August 29th, 2007

Al Gore’s $100 million makeover

gore.jpgBeyond your political views – and I’m sure he’s a probably a decent person to hang out with – Al Gore just doesn’t do much for me. That’s why I was particularly intrigued to see him on the cover of the July/August issue of Fast Company magazine in an article entitled “Al Gore’s $100 million makeover.”

Did you know that he’s been able to transform an epic loss into a multi-faceted enterprise encompassing global companies such as Apple, Google, and a host of other financial interests? Here’s a quick glimpse of his resume:

Read the rest of this entry »

Tag Your FavoritesThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb